The Gallup Organization needs to catch a ride on a Cluetrain. They produced a book called Now, Discover Your Strengths by Marcus Buckingham & Donald O. Clifton. This is the kind of book that you would expect to have some kind of instrument to help one discover one's strengths. Turns out it's not in the book, it's on the web. Cool, thought I, until I realized that you had to register using the 14-digit number inside the book jacket which would only work once.
I, of course, got the book from the library. The library, of course, glued the book jacket on in such a way that the number was ruined before anyone got to read the book. And even if the number hadn't been glued into oblivion, only the first borrower would have been able to take advantage of it. Not a good book for a library to own, but the collection librarian would have to read half-way through the book before he or she would realize that.
Can you imagine how many more books they could sell if the instrument were freely available? We might all be blogging "go take this test--and read the book!"
Anyway. Being reasonably self-aware, I decided to determine my own strengths from the descriptions in the book.
As a Developer, I feel that if you write a self-help book, a primary motivator should be to help people grow and that means making your material fully available through libraries to people who can't or won't purchase the book.
My Connectedness strength leads me to believe that a secondary motivator for such a book should be to change the world. You don't do that by hiding your light under a bushel or behind a firewall. The message in this book really could change our organizations. It delivers a convincing argument that the path to excellence is in developing our strengths while the path to mediocrity lies in attempting to remediate our weaknesses. But I can't recommend it to my organization--we would have to buy 150 copies to get started.
Both of these concerns, helping people and changing the world, should at least appear to take precedence over milking every last dollar out of the consuming public. The appearance of greediness takes something away from the overall message of the book--it makes me doubt its sincerity.
As someone with a strength of Intellection, I think that an instrument requires testing and that biasing the results by only allowing those who are willing and able to pay for a book to take the test is unacceptable.
I just stretched their definition of Intellection to make my story better, using my strength for Communication.
Fortunately, I am a Learner so I can invent my own method for figuring out what I want to know.
So, there. Their test would have given me five strengths. I'm 80% sure they would have been these: Developer, Connectedness, Intellection, Communication, and Learner. I suspect I'll get my money's worth (heh) out of the rest of the book with that 80% certainty.
I probably wouldn't have responded so negatively had I not taken a wonderful and free profile just this week. It was recommended by our Instruction Coordinator as part of a late summer effort to improve our teaching librarian skills. If you teach, consider taking the Teaching Perspectives Inventory. It doesn't work perfectly well for those of us teaching one-shots, but it's still a useful tool from a group of people who are enjoying the scenery from their Cluetrain.
#
June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007
