I've been thinking, for a couple of weeks now, about "What Price Collegiality?" the post on Library 2.0: An Academic's Perspective. I've seen this idea on other library blogs, too, in various contexts -- that we can't promote change in our libraries if we're too nice, too agreeable, too collegial. Since I haven't heard any dissenting voices, here's one.
You can be collegial and make changes in your library at the same time. It takes some finesse. Sometimes, it takes some patience, but not as much as you might think.
If you bring up your idea in a weekly meeting every week for a month or six weeks, the person who thought it intolerably scary at the beginning of that time is now thinking "that old idea again? why doesn't she just get on with it!" And, the next day, you're registering an IM address for the reference librarians and downloading Trillian on the computer at the desk.
Here are some other strategies:
June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007
