I've been too busy working on things for the Missouri Library Association conference to blog about them like I promised! I'll try to do better because the two future chairs of the Computer and Information Technology SIG have said they think these will be useful when it's their turn.

Last year when I attempted to recruit session hosts, people to introduce each program session that the SIG sponsors and to mention the SIG in the process, I got no takers. This year, with three times as many programs, I managed to get them all covered. Here's what I learned--start earlier and ask twice! Last year, I started about two weeks in advance and took a non-answer as a "no." This year, I started about a month in advance and took a non-answer as "I haven't worked it out yet." In the end, everyone that I asked said "yes" and seemed happy to do it; it just often took a second prompt or a more detailed "how about hosting this session?" request.

This year the Conference Chair wanted to have evaluation forms for each session of the conference. In the past, that was something that one or two Divisions and SIGs did for their own sessions, but was not widely practiced. I had planned to steal the idea and form from MACRL (the Missouri Association of College and Research Libraries, one MLA division that has used session evaluation forms consistently for years), especially since one of our speakers last year hinted that she would like to have session evaluations.

So, once the Conference Chair came up with that idea, I volunteered, figuring that it wouldn't be much more work to handle the session evaluation forms for the whole conference than for just the CIT SIG's sessions. As it turned out, it was less work because I got a lot of help. The chairs of the SIGs and Divisions worked collaboratively to create the form. Margaret Booker, the MLA Executive Director, offered to print them and bring them to the conference.

We're asking our session hosts to handle the evaluation forms for each session. Since one of my other conference hats is working on the Hospitality committee, the blank forms will be in the Hospitality area along with a file box for the filled-out forms. Filled-out forms will go in a file labeled with the sponsoring Division or SIG. The Division or SIG chair will pick up his or her file at the end of the conference to analyze and summarize the forms.

I'd be curious how other conferences handle analyzing and summarizing forms. Our Executive Director, who summarizes the evaluation forms for the conference as a whole, recognized immediately that the real work would start after the conference and would be too much for her to handle, maybe too much for any one person to handle. Since the history in our organization was for Divisions and SIGs to do their own evaluation forms, if they wanted to, it seemed natural to ask them to take care of it. Of course, it hasn't happened yet, so I'm hoping that doesn't turn out to be too much of a burden for the officers of Divisions and SIGs. Since my SIG is sponsoring the most programs, I felt pretty comfortable taking the lead on this -- I'm not asking anyone to do more work than I am!     #    (0) comments

June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 June 2008 September 2008